menu-bgimg

What we can offer you

We provide detailed transactional data, cost benchmarks and in-depth analytics for participants in the wood raw materials supply chain.
  • Pricing Data
  • Benchmarks
  • Product Forecasting
  • Advisory Services
  • Analytics
Learn More

SilvaStat360 Platform

  • Price Benchmarks
  • Madison’s Lumber Reporter
  • The Beck Group’s Sawmill TQ
  • Timber Supply Analysis 
  • Global Economic Data

Explore Forest2Market's Interactive Business Intelligence Platform

Learn More

Industries

From biomass suppliers in the Baltics to pulp producers in Brazil and TIMOs in the United States, Forest2Market provides products and services for suppliers, producers and other stakeholders in the global forest products industry.

Learn More
x
 
Blog

Identifying Opportunities for Improving Lumber Recovery

April 03, 2019
Author: Bryan Beck

When it comes to lumber recovery and comparing performance between individual sawmills, the most important factor is log size. As the chart below illustrates, log size (average bucked log, small-end diameter) and lumber recovery (tons of logs used to produce a thousand board feet of lumber) are strongly correlated, with yield generally improving as log diameter increases. 

Beck_Recovery1

For mill #8 in the chart above, however, we can see that lumber yield is much higher (worse) than other mills using similar-sized log size. This data suggests that something other than log size is significantly impacting this mill’s performance.     

Other factors that can have a strong influence on lumber recovery include:

  • Rough green lumber target sizes
  • Saw kerfs
  • Equipment optimization
  • Lumber product mix
  • Operator decisions

When focusing next on lumber target sizes, most southern yellow pine sawmills generate a product mix that is heavy to 2” thick (nominal) dimension lumber, so the rough green target thickness for 2” lumber is the most important factor to focus on. 

 

Beck_Recovery2

 

Reviewing the chart above, we can see that for mill #8, the 2” target size is well above average, meaning that this is likely a significant area of opportunity for improvement. In other words, we now know that other mills have been able to achieve much smaller target size while producing a comparable product. 

We can also use a similar process to investigate benchmarks for other target sizes (additional thicknesses and widths), for saw kerfs, etc. to see if additional opportunities are apparent. With this information in hand, mill management can focus on reducing target sizes by examining sawing variation, allowance for shrinkage while drying, and other factors in the sawmill, kilns and planer.

With the appropriate level of detail in benchmarking data, a mill management team can move quickly from identifying a broad area of opportunity to a focused set of actions to drive improvements and increase profitability. 

 

Benchmarking for success with Sawmill TQ

Back to Blog

You May Also be Interested In

February 19, 2020
US Forest Industry Performance: January 2020
US forest industry performance in December 2019 and January 2020 was recently reported by both the US government and...
Continue Reading
February 17, 2020
PNW Log & Lumber Prices: 1Q2020 Update
As Forest2Market data has confirmed over the last several years, log and lumber prices in the Pacific Northwest...
Continue Reading
February 04, 2020
Sustainable Forestry and Land Retention Study Quantifies Impact for Landowners
Clearing Land Title Generates the Greatest Economic Benefit  
Continue Reading