menu-bgimg

What we can offer you

We provide detailed transactional data, cost benchmarks and in-depth analytics for participants in the wood raw materials supply chain.
  • Pricing Data
  • Benchmarks
  • Product Forecasting
  • Advisory Services
  • Analytics
Learn More

SilvaStat360 Platform

  • Price Benchmarks
  • Madison’s Lumber Reporter
  • The Beck Group’s Sawmill TQ
  • Timber Supply Analysis 
  • Global Economic Data

Explore Forest2Market's Interactive Business Intelligence Platform

Learn More

Industries

From biomass suppliers in the Baltics to pulp producers in Brazil and TIMOs in the United States, Forest2Market provides products and services for suppliers, producers and other stakeholders in the global forest products industry.

Learn More
x
 
Blog

Two Things the Dogwood Alliance Doesn’t Want You to Know about Its Wood Pellet Study

August 10, 2015
Author: Suz-Anne Kinney

The Dogwood Alliance recently commissioned a study, Wood Pellet Manufacturing: Risks for the Economy of the US South, to uncover the myriad ways that the wood pellet industry will hobble the economy in the US South. The study itself, however, falls short of proving the definitive declarations that the Dogwood Alliance has been making about the study in the press (here). Here are two things they fail to mention:Pellet_facility_with_wood_yard

  1. The report’s conclusions are largely conditional. They include (emphasis added):
    • Switching fuel to biomass pellets imported from the US South may increase rather than reduce greenhouse gas emissions—an effect opposite the one intended.
    • Possible declines in forest health due to whole-tree harvesting, and relatively more forestland in plantations could harm timber productivity and broader ecosystem service values.
    • Loss of amenity and increased industrialization of rural landscapes could limit the attractiveness of the region as a location for new residents and businesses.
    • Expansion of biomass pellet manufacturing in the US Coastal South will raise timber prices in the short term and could change industry structure for decades to come.
    • Pellet manufacturing will increase at the expense of lumber, panel and paper manufacturing, in which job creation is typically stronger than it may be in pellets.
  2. The report concludes by minimizing the scope of the risks to the South’s economy: “We do not wish to overstate the case: these individual cautions are primarily about marginal or incremental, rather than wholesale, changes in forest productivity, availability of ecosystem services and economic opportunity in a range of sectors.”

 

New Call-to-action

Back to Blog

You May Also be Interested In

August 22, 2019
WSJ’s Incomplete Reporting Perpetuates Misconceptions About Bioenergy
A recent article published in the Wall Street Journal notes that the increased consumption of wood pellets in the...
Continue Reading
July 10, 2019
Regional Wood Fiber Costs vs. Oil Prices: Is there a Correlation?
In my first installment on the topic of oil price volatility and its impact on delivered wood costs, I showed the...
Continue Reading
April 18, 2019
For Asian Bioenergy Producers, Success is Driven by Mastering Feedstock Management
The largest risks with early-stage project development of modern bioenergy plants—including the ability to raise the...
Continue Reading