menu-bgimg

What we can offer you

We provide detailed transactional data, cost benchmarks and in-depth analytics for participants in the wood raw materials supply chain.
  • Pricing Data
  • Benchmarks
  • Product Forecasting
  • Advisory Services
  • Analytics
Learn More

SilvaStat360 Platform

  • Price Benchmarks
  • Madison’s Lumber Reporter
  • The Beck Group’s Sawmill TQ
  • Timber Supply Analysis 
  • Global Economic Data

Explore Forest2Market's Interactive Business Intelligence Platform

Learn More

Industries

From biomass suppliers in the Baltics to pulp producers in Brazil and TIMOs in the United States, Forest2Market provides products and services for suppliers, producers and other stakeholders in the global forest products industry.

Learn More
x
 
Blog

NAFO Report Highlights Part 2: Economic Impact of Forest Products Industry

June 03, 2016

Forest2Market recently completed an economic impact study for the National Alliance of Forest Owners (NAFO). The study quantifies the contribution that forestry-related industries make to state, regional and national economies, and analyzes the most forested regions of the United States based on the most recent year of data available, which is 2013. The following map identifies the regions that were the subject of the study.

 

NAFO_Map.png

 

Economic Impact of Working Forests: Employment & Payroll 

Direct employment refers to the number of full- and part-time jobs at forestry-related businesses. Direct payroll refers to the payroll contributions associated with direct employment. Forestry-related businesses support over 1 million direct jobs, which are associated with over $48.8 billion in direct payroll (Table 3‑1). 

In addition to direct employment and payroll, forestry-related businesses create further employment opportunities via both indirect and induced impacts.

  • Indirect impacts are the production, employment and income changes occurring in other businesses that supply inputs to the industry under consideration.
  • Induced impacts are the effects of spending by households as the result of direct and indirect effects. The induced effects arise when direct employees spend their income in the community.

The combined effect of direct, indirect and induced impacts is referred to as total employment and total payroll. Forestry-related businesses support 2.7 million total jobs and are associated with $112.7 billion in total payroll. 

Including direct, indirect and induced employment, forestry-related businesses support over 1.2 million jobs in the South, 554.5 thousand jobs in the Midwest, 409.7 thousand jobs in the Pacific Northwest, 397.0 thousand jobs in Appalachia and 145.7 thousand jobs in the Northeast (Figure 1). Approximately 45 percent of the direct, indirect and induced jobs in the study area are attributable to the South.

Private timberland supports around 1.2 million jobs in the South, 385.4 thousand jobs in the Midwest, 337.1 thousand jobs in Appalachia, 312.2 thousand jobs in the Pacific Northwest and 122.2 thousand jobs in the Northeast (Figure 2).

NAFO_2_Employment1-1.png

 

NAFO_2_Employment3.png 

Total payroll in forestry-related businesses is $47.7 billion in the South, $23.8 billion in the Midwest, $17.9 billion in the Pacific Northwest, $17.0 billion in Appalachia and $6.3 billion in the Northeast (Figure 3). Total payroll contributions attributable to private timberland are $45.7 billion in the South, $16.5 billion in the Midwest, $14.4 billion in Appalachia, $13.6 billion in the Pacific Northwest and $5.3 billion in the Northeast (Figure 4).

 

NAFO_2_Payroll1.png

NAFO_2_Payroll2-1.png

 

Economic Impact of Working Forests: Contribution to GDP

GDP associated with paper, wood and furniture manufacturing industries totals nearly $92.8 billion.

Nationally, paper, wood and furniture manufacturing industries are 5.3 percent of total manufacturing GDP, and approximately $81.3 billion of forestry-related businesses’ contribution to GDP is associated with private timberland. 

In the South, forest products manufacturing industries contributed over $4 billion to GDP in Georgia, North Carolina, Texas and Alabama. Forest products manufacturing companies in Oklahoma and Missouri contributed the least to GDP in the South at $913 million and $1.8 billion, respectively. 

In Appalachia, Pennsylvania has the highest forest products manufacturing contribution to GDP at $5.8 billion, which is 7.5 percent of Pennsylvania’s manufacturing GDP and 0.9 percent of total state GDP. Maryland forest products manufacturing companies contribute the least to state GDP at $613 million, which is 3.3 percent of manufacturing GDP and 0.2 percent of total state GDP.

In the Northeast, New York’s forest products manufacturing companies contribute just under $3.1 billion to the state’s GDP, which is the highest in this region. However, as a share of state manufacturing and total GDP, Maine’s $1.2 billion contribution represents 22.9 percent of the state’s manufacturing GDP and 2.1 percent of total GDP. New Hampshire forest products companies contribute the least to their state’s GDP at $264 million annually (3.4 percent of manufacturing GDP and 0.4 percent of state GDP). 

In the Northwest, forest products manufacturing companies in California contribute $6.3 billion to GDP, which is 2.6 percent of state manufacturing GDP and 0.3 percent of total state GDP. Oregon and Washington companies contribute over $3 billion each to their states’ GDP, and forest products manufacturing is 5.8 percent and 5.4 percent of total manufacturing GDP, respectively. Montana forest products companies contribute the least to GDP in terms of dollar output at only $294 million, but this is 9.4 percent of Montana’s manufacturing GDP, the highest share in this region. 

In the Midwest, Wisconsin forest products manufacturing companies contribute nearly $6.1 billion (2.1 percent) to their state’s GDP, and forest products represent 11.3 percent of state manufacturing GDP. Minnesota companies contribute just under $3.0 billion to their state’s GDP, the lowest in the region. Illinois forest products manufacturing at $3.5 billion represents 0.5 percent of state GDP.

NAFO_2_State.png

 Read the full study and use the interactive state data feature on NAFO's website.

 How to sell timber

 

Back to Blog

You May Also be Interested In

December 05, 2019
How Misinformation Produces Flawed Climate and Carbon Policies
This post appears courtesy of guest blogger Nick Smith, who is Executive Director of Healthy Forests, Healthy...
Continue Reading
November 13, 2019
3 Reasons Forests are Invaluable to Both Humanity and the Environment
Forest2Market recently hosted two students from the British International School in Charlotte, NC in support of the...
Continue Reading
October 28, 2019
Future Forests + Jobs: Growing Forests and Building a Stronger Economy
A core mission of Forest2Market is to provide fact-based, data-driven insights to stakeholders in the forest...
Continue Reading